Certainly! Let’s compare FundingPips and E8 Markets based on their two-step evaluation programs, focusing on key criteria such as profit targets, drawdown limits, trading day requirements, and payout structures.
⚖️ FundingPips vs E8 Markets: Two-Step Evaluation Comparison
1. Profit Targets
- FundingPips: Phase 1: 8%, Phase 2: 5%
- E8 Markets: Phase 1: 8%, Phase 2: 4%
2. Maximum Daily Loss
- FundingPips: 5%
- E8 Markets: 2% daily pause (equivalent to a 2% daily loss limit)
3. Maximum Overall Loss
- FundingPips: 10%
- E8 Markets: 8%
4. Minimum Trading Days
- FundingPips: 3 calendar days per phase
- E8 Markets: 4 calendar days (due to the 2% daily profit cap)
5. Maximum Trading Period
- FundingPips: Unlimited
- E8 Markets: Unlimited
6. Profit Split
- FundingPips: 80%
- E8 Markets: 80%
7. First Payout
- FundingPips: After 8 calendar days
- E8 Markets: After 8 calendar days
✅ Summary
Both FundingPips and E8 Markets offer competitive two-step evaluation programs with similar profit targets, maximum loss limits, and profit splits. The primary differences lie in the daily loss limits and the minimum trading days required. FundingPips allows for a higher daily loss limit (5%) and requires fewer minimum trading days (3) compared to E8 Markets’ 2% daily pause and 4-day minimum. E8 Markets’ daily profit cap may necessitate a more measured trading approach.
Ultimately, the choice between the two firms may depend on your trading style and risk tolerance. If you prefer a higher daily loss limit and a shorter evaluation period, FundingPips might be more suitable. Conversely, if you value a structured trading environment with a daily profit cap, E8 Markets could be the better fit.
Company Overview
| Detail | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Legal / Incorporation | ANKH PROP – FZCO, incorporated 25 August 2022 | FXIFY Solutions Limited, incorporated May 2023 |
| Location / Headquarters | Dubai, UAE (IFZA Business Park) | London, UK (Unit 1, 74 Back Church Lane, E1 1LX) |
| CEO / Founders | Khaled Ayesh | David Bhidey & Peter Brown |
| Philosophy / Mission | Emphasizes the three stages of trader growth (Student → Practitioner → Master), offers flexible program options | Focuses on discipline, risk management, and multiple paths to funding via several program types |
| Max Account Size | Up to $100,000 | Up to $400,000 |
Funding Program Options
| Program Type | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Two-step / Two-phase | ✅ (Two-step Pro, Two-step) | ✅ (Two-phase) |
| One-step / Single evaluation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Instant / Direct funding (skip challenge) | ✅ (Zero Program) | ✅ |
| Additional types | — | Lightning / Three-phase |
Observation: FXIFY offers more program diversity (Lightning, Three-phase) and a larger maximum account size. FundingPips focuses more on scalable progression and “mastery” features.
Rules, Targets & Requirements (Representative Comparison)
Below is a simplified comparison of one-step evaluation vs two-step programs. Note: both firms have variations depending on account size, add-ons, etc.
| Metric | FundingPips (One-step) | FXIFY (One-phase) |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Target | 10% | 10% |
| Max Daily Loss | 4% | 3% |
| Max Trailing Loss / Total Loss | 6% | 6% |
| Minimum Trading Days | 3 | 5 |
| Leverage | Up to 1:50 | Up to 1:30 (1:50 with add-on) |
| Profit Split | 80% → up to 100% (depending on payout cycle & scaling) | 80% → up to 90% |
| Scaling / Growth | Yes (after consistent payouts, Hot Seat, etc.) | Yes (after 2 of last 3 months, 10% average return) |
| Payout / Withdrawal Conditions | First payout after reaching withdrawal target (or on schedule), further payouts depend on cycle (weekly, monthly) | First on-demand, then monthly or bi-weekly via add-on |
For the two-step / two-phase paths, both firms demand phased profit targets and drawdown limits, though the exact percentages differ (e.g. FundingPips often allows higher daily/trailing drawdowns in some plans).
Account Sizes & Costs (Example Tiers)
| Account Tier | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $59 (One-step), $36 (Two-step) etc. | $59 |
| $10,000 | $99 (One-step), $66 (Two-step) etc. | $89 |
| $25,000 | $199 (One-step) etc. | $119 |
| $50,000 | $299 (One-step) etc. | $379 |
| $100,000 | $499 (One-step) etc. | $499 |
| Larger sizes | up to $100,000 | up to $400,000 |
FXIFY offers much higher ceiling; for overlapping tiers (e.g. $100k) cost structure is similar.
Brokers, Platforms & Instruments
| Feature | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Broker / Liquidity | Tier-1 liquidity provider (simulated real market) | FXPIG as broker |
| Platforms allowed | Match-Trader, cTrader, TradeLocker, MetaTrader 5 | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, DXtrade |
| Tradable Instruments | Forex, commodities, indices, cryptocurrencies | Forex, commodities, indices, stocks, cryptocurrencies |
| Leverage | Up to 1:100 (varies by program) | Up to 1:30 (1:50 add-on) |
| Commission / Fees (typical) | E.g. Forex — 2 USD/lot, Indices no commission | Zero on many instruments or built into “all-in” spread |
FXIFY supports stocks in addition to the usual instruments; FundingPips is strong on crypto & forex but doesn’t list stocks.
Community Feedback & Reputation
| Metric | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Trustpilot (or Reviews) | 4.4 / 5 (≈ 22,745 reviews, 81% 5-stars) | 4.1 / 5 (≈ 3,264 reviews, 77% 5-stars) |
| Payment / Payout Proof | Many testimonials, YouTube, Discord payout certificates | Also has payout claims and community proof, Trustpilot feedback |
| Social Presence | Strong across Discord, Instagram, YouTube, etc. | Solid presence on Discord, Twitter, Instagram, etc. |
| Support / Customer Service | Live chat, email, Discord, multiple languages | Live chat, email, Discord, etc. |
FundingPips seems to have a more extensive footprint in terms of reviews and social proof, but both firms appear to be active in community engagement.
Strengths & Considerations
FundingPips – Strengths
- High profit splits (up to 100%) under certain conditions.
- Multiple evaluation paths catering to different types of traders.
- Strong social proof and many payout testimonials.
- Scalability (Hot Seat, increasing drawdowns, account growth) built into program.
- More aggressive leverage in some programs (1:100).
FundingPips – Considerations / Risks
- Some rules (e.g. strict drawdowns or daily lot limits) may be more restrictive in certain plans.
- Zero Program has a “protection” mechanism (first profit not withdrawable).
- Complexity: multiple plans and payout cycles may require careful reading.
FXIFY – Strengths
- Higher max account size ($400k) gives traders more room to scale.
- More program variety (Lightning, Three-phase) for different risk and timeline preferences.
- On-demand payouts from funded account (for many plans).
- Transparent rules, add-ons (higher split, leverage), and scaling options.
- Support of stock trading in addition to common instruments.
FXIFY – Considerations / Risks
- Base profit split ceilings are lower (max 90%) unless add-on.
- Some stricter daily/trailing loss percentages in certain plans (e.g. 3% daily in One-phase).
- Because it’s newer (2023 incorporation), long-term track record is shorter.
Summary & Recommendation
- If your strategy aims to scale aggressively and you target accounts beyond $100,000, FXIFY might be more attractive because of its higher ceiling and broader program options.
- If your priority is maximizing profit split, flexibility in payout cycles, and strong community validation, FundingPips is compelling (especially with its 100% split potential and wide social proof).
- For traders who prefer more program flexibility (lightning, multi-phase, skipping stages), FXIFY has more variety.
- For traders who prefer simplicity, consistent scaling paths and a firm that is well-established in review forums, FundingPips is a solid choice.
